June 24, 2008
 |
A group in Denver wants the okay to smoke marijuana in Denver International’s “smoking lounges”.
Hey, who knew they had smoking lounges? Who knew they had FOUR of them?!
Anyway, the “Safer Alternative for Enjoyable Recreation” folks want their weed while they wait for their planes.
Yeah, right. Good luck, guys!
Oh, wait…didn’t Denver voters okay a measure to make possession of an ounce or less, within city limits…legal? Indeed they did.
|
June 3, 2008
 |
In the biggest affront to the Transformers franchise since Soundwave was left out of the movie, a traveler at London Heathrow allegedly was told he couldn’t fly because he was wearing a shirt featuring a Transformer holding a gun.
The shirt, featuring famed Autobot leader Optimus Prime was said to be offensive by a Heathrow security guard, so the man changed shirts before boarding. This is London quotes a Heathrow rep as saying “If a T-shirt had a rude word or a bomb on it, for example, a passenger may be asked to remove it. We are investigating what happened to see if it came under this category. If it’s offensive, we don’t want other passengers upset.”
What’s more offensive to me (and to some of those who left comments) is that the guy in question seems to think Megatron is on his shirt. Come on, man. That’s totally Prime.
|
May 29, 2008
 |
It seems even supermodels get their day in court.
Back in the beginning of April, we reported on famed beauty and alleged phone-thrower Naomi Campbell causing a scene at Heathrow’s then brand new Terminal 5.
Upon landing, Ms. Campbell was escorted off a plane by officers, and as reported by Breitbart.com, was subsequently charged with “three counts of assaulting a constable, one of disorderly conduct likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress and one of using threatening or abusive words or behaviour to cabin crew.”
Naomi will appear in court in London on June 20th, so the whole mess should be wrapped up relatively soon.
Now, if only an angry supermodel was the worst problem Heathrow’s Terminal 5 had to deal with.
|
May 21, 2008
 |
Okay, there’s mother, father, grandma, grandpa and toddler. Here’s the story of their Big Adventure.
Earlier this month, the happy little family was running, running, running to catch an Air Canada flight in the Vancouver airport. With no time to spare, they made the plane. All got onboard, and all were scattered throughout the aircraft.
Which is apparently why nobody noticed that nobody had the toddler. Yes, the beloved little tyke had been forgotten. He was eventually found by some Air Canadians, no doubt wondering where the heck everyone had disappeared to.
Actually, this is an extraordinary story of detective work on the part of the airline folks, who eventually reunited the kid with his parents (among the hurdles: the child was a lap sitter so he didn’t show up on the manifest, plus he was only 2-years old so he didn’t speak much, plus what little he did speak was Tagalog — this was an immigrant family from the Philippines).
Hey, all’s well that ends well.
|
April 3, 2008
 |
Oh, Naomi Campbell. We can’t take you anywhere.
Supermodel Naomi Campbell, as famous for her work on the catwalk as for throwing phones and attacking her maids, is at it again. According to reports by the Mirror and CNN, Ms. Campbell has been arrested on suspicion of assault after being taken off a plane at Heathrow’s already beleaguered Terminal 5. It seems that Campbell’s tirade stemmed from an issue of lost luggage. Had she read our CEO’s report on mishandled baggage at Terminal 5, she may have been better prepared.
Unfortunately, she didn’t handle it well. Passengers claim Ms. Campbell was “aggressive to flight staff,” and she was removed from the plane. No news on as to how this will affect her dancing lizard commercials.
|
March 19, 2008
 |
Our clever boss has done it again — in his latest column for ABCNews.com, Mr. FareCompare tells us what to do if we’re trapped in an airport because of delays or cancellations.
But even better, Mr. FC (that’s Rick Seaney to you) has his own post about this, COMPLETE WITH VITAL LINKS.
CHECK THEM OUT. YOU’LL BE GLAD YOU DID. I PROMISE.
Done shouting now.
|
March 12, 2008
 |
Not many know this, but some airports have “theme songs”. Los Angeles International Airport, for example, has the cleverly named, “LA International Airport”, a country hit back in 1971 (hum along with me: “LA International Airport, where the big jet engines roar…”)
Ooh, the goose-bumps! Anyway, this was the subject of a snappy article in USA Today. And it got me to thinking…
Help me out here, people. Let’s find airport homes for The Who’s “Won’t Get Fooled Again”, Pink Floyd’s “Comfortably Numb”, Tom Petty’s “Free Fallin’”, and the Rolling Stones’ “(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction”, “You Can’t Always Get What You Want” and “Paint it Black”.
Clearly, Jagger & Co. have spent some time in airports.
|
March 6, 2008
 |
If you’ve ever cut it close on making a flight, or if you’ve had to change terminals to make and had to go through airport security for a second time in one day while desperately trying to make a connecting flight, you know that the 50 people in front of you with laptops can slow you down. The line just seems to pile up as people (most likely you included) reach into bags to pull out computers, portable DVD players, and any other large electronics they might have.
Well, the TSA feels your pain, and they want to do something about it. Or at least, they want to consider doing something about it. The TSA is in search of the perfect laptop bag; one that will let you run your laptop through while it’s still in its bag.
Keep reading to see exactly what the TSA is planning…
|
(more…)
February 29, 2008
 |
If you’ve ever desperately needed to get some work done in an airport, you know how difficult it can be to find a hot spot. Have you elbowed a fellow traveler out of the way? Have you paid someone off to get that precious plug their using? If so, you should be happy to know that there are many airports around the world doing their best to make your life a little easier. They’re adding free WiFi, business centers, and easier access to all things wired.
Keep reading for a look at the list of Forbes’ top five airports with WiFi (OK. Top six. There was a tie)…
|
(more…)
February 1, 2008
 |
Sick of taking off your shoes at airports? Tired of seeing grandma getting frisked?
Tell the TSA!
Yes, the fine folks at the Transportation Security Administration have their own blog! (Thanks, Jaunted). Here’s the site–now, fire away, and keep reading for a sample comment that might sound pretty familiar…
|
(more…)
January 25, 2008
 |
Some homeowners in near Philadelphia’s airport are not pleased with recent FAA changes to departure headings.
It means more jet noise for them. So they sent the FAA a message. It’s on their roof.
Even though the message is only “initials” I don’t think we can get away with printing it. So you’ll just have to click here, and see the photo for yourself…
|
January 22, 2008
 |
The Bureau of Transportation Statistics has spoken, and it looks like Chicago O’Hare has the worst on-time departure percentage once again.
For the second straight year, the Second City’s mammoth airport has let more than a few travelers down when it comes to getting them to where they need to go on-time. Passenger traffic and weather of course affect O’Hare’s ability to keep on-time departure percentages up, but other “bad weather” and busy airports faired considerably better.
Congratulations are in order for Salt Lake City. With on-time departures at 84.94%, SLC ranked #1 among major airports.
Check out rickseaney.com for the complete rankings.
|
January 17, 2008
 |
JFK is turning into some horrible movie where a bunch of aging actors stand around and talk about “pulling off one last heist” while holding postcards of the island resort where they’ll retire and live a “normal life” once said heist has been pulled.
In case you’ve been out of the loop, in a relatively short period of time, workers at JFK have stolen credit card numbers, run smuggling rings, and made off with people’s baggage. Well, I guess none of those was worthy of “one final score” status, because JFK workers are now being accused of stealing $250,000 in diamonds.
Oh, JFK workers don’t you know that those heist movies almost always end poorly. Check out The Consumerist for all of the details.
Liked this story? Check out “Odd Uncle = D.B. Cooper?”
|
January 15, 2008
 |
No matter how much time I have on my hands when I travel to Los Angeles or Las Vegas, getting to In-N-Out Burger always tops my list of priorities. Sadly, the times I’ve had layovers at LAX, I’ve been unable to sate my hunger for those delicious burgers.
Thankfully, the good people at Gadling have made sure that will never happen again. They’ve laid out a surefire way to get from LAX to In-N-Out for free in a very short period of time. It involves a shuttle and maybe a little bit of subterfuge, but if you’re willing (and you know you are), you can get your hands on a delicious burger and be back in time to catch your flight.
Read Gadling’s Free LAX shuttle to In-N-Out Burgers to get all the details.
|
January 10, 2008
 |
No, no, that’s the wrong answer and you should be ashamed of yourself. The correct response is, both have made the “No Fly” list.
The senator has since gotten himself off the list, but not so our young hero. The 5-year old Seattle area lad was at Sea-Tac last week, heading to LAX with his mom.
Then, the long arm of the law reached out: Not so fast, son! You Are On Our List.
Of course, it was Mom who got frisked. Go figure. But eventually, they got on the plane.
Saw this on Consumerist. And Consumerist never leaves you hanging–here’s their link to getting yourself OFF the “No Fly” list. Oh, and here’s some video of the kid. He seems harmless…
|
January 3, 2008
 |
Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson has been named the busiest (in terms of flights) airport for the third year in a row:
“The Atlanta airport logged 994,466 flights in 2007, up 1.8 percent from 976,447 in 2006, the Federal Aviation Administration said. Flights include takeoffs and landings.” (From the Boston Globe)
Sure, it may log more flights, but my recent experiences have proven, at least to me, that ATL is far easier to handle then JFK and far easier to get out of than LAX. Seriously, LAX, do something about the cab/shuttle/car situation out there. It’s a nightmare.
|
January 2, 2008
December 5, 2007
 |
Preparation is a favorite topic of ours around here (yes, we are an exciting bunch), because it really can save you substantial time and spare you some of the headaches associated with air travel. You can even make your trip through the security line at the airport a little easier with just a little preparation.
Fly Away Cafe has a great post that lays out the best way to save time (hopefully) when heading through security. Some tips are as simple as “Think about what you are going to wear, and make sure that it’s something that can easily get through security.” It’s little things like that we travelers often overlook.
It’s written by a flight attendant, so you know she’s seen her share of security lines. Check out the post to get more tips of security line prep. |
November 6, 2007
 |
The Wall Street Journal covered the release of DOT data tracking the on-time percentages of major airports throughout the country. Most can’t seem to get above a “C- average,” and many have just flat out failed. Keep reading for a list of the worst 15: |
(more…)
October 23, 2007

Well, at least that’s how the venerable city fathers of Sioux City, Iowa used to feel about their airport’s FAA code, which is, yes, SUX.
But where once there were plans afoot to ditch the designation, now, Sioux Citians are embracing their inner SUX. The airport’s new marketing campaign calls for all things SUX. Just look at the airport’s official website, which has been renamed www.flysux.com; and now you can buy t-shirts and caps with the SUX logo.
We like this. We always suspected those corn-fed, friendly folks in Iowa had a pretty good sense of humor, because, face it, ya need one, living in Iowa. Or were we thinking of Idaho? Ah, whats the difference…
Anyway, it could have been worse for Sioux City; take a look at some of our other favorite airport codes:
- Altoona, PA (AOO) The sound passengers make after a near-collision.
- Fresno, CA (FAT) McDonald-land.
- Grand Rapids, MI (GRR) Home of the Angry Mid-Westerners.
- Point Lay, AK (PIZ) I dont think Sioux City would have traded for this one.
October 18, 2007

Was perusing the euphoniously named “United Really Sucks” website the other day when I came upon a sucky story indeed (we discovered the site thanks to the fine folks at Consumerist). Note: the author is an anonymous blogger. Just so we know where we are.
Anyway, it seems a Good Samaritan took a friend’s cat to the Sacramento airport to ship it to this friend, who’d flown ahead to Denver (friend was in the process of moving, you see).
Anyway, much merriment ensued at the United counter, where Good Sam was told he had the wrong sort of carrier (he didnt), that the cat’s paperwork was not in order (it was), and on and on and on. Cat finally flew out 2-days later. Did the cat survive the journey? We’re left hanging on that point, but we do know Sam says United will never get anymore of his business.
The cat’s name? Again, we’re left in the dark. Could it have been Branson? Southwest? We at Standard Upright Position can only speculate…
October 2, 2007

If you’re fond of bringing remote control toys onboard airplanes, things might get a little more complicated for you. While you can still carry those RC cars and ‘copters on, the TSA might put you through increased security, patting you down in the process.
As reported by USA Today: “Intelligence and law enforcement have developed information that terrorists are interested in using remote-controlled toy vehicles as part of their tactics,” TSA chief Kip Hawley said in an interview. “There were some dots that came together.”
My advice: If you’re checking bags, put the remote control vehicle or robot in the suitcase. If that’s not an option, give yourself some extra time to make it through the security line. This includes children, too. The new security policy applies to travelers of all ages.
September 25, 2007

In the days of TiVo, online entertainment, and video games, it’s getting harder for advertisers to reach their chosen demographics. You can fast forward right through those commercials and laugh off those terrible product placement shots. But when you’re taking off in an airplane, can you stop yourself from looking down? Some crafty ad types are betting you can’t.
As reported by MSNBC, many of the world’s largest airports will see giant ads placed along the runway, and we air travelers will have no choice but to do as they say. At least we’ll finally have something to look at when we’re taking off. I mean, who wants to sit back and appreciate the fusion of technology and nature as the aircraft rises up over verdant woods and heads into a clear blue sky? Not me. I want people to sell me stuff.
September 18, 2007

In what sounds like the beginning of a bad joke, famed TV animal guy Jack Hannah got trapped in a security turnstile with an 11 month-old Flamingo while escorting the bird (and other animals) through a closed terminal at Ohio State University Airport. Said, Hannah:
“I never thought about the crate being square and the turnstile being round…I was stuck like a worm. My eyes were as big as grapefruits…I can’t describe the feeling in my stomach. I can’t move up or down. The bars are on your face.” (From MSNBC)
Hannah eventually broke free and went for help. Through the efforts of three firefighters, the flamingo was hoisted out of the turnstile.
Both Bird and Hannah are doing fine.
September 13, 2007

Ever since the TSA set forth their policy regarding liquids on planes (the 3-1-1 rule, if you like), travelers have been annoyed, and questions have surrounded the whole affair. Is the rule arbitrary? What are the reasons for it? Is the TSA in cahoots with the makers of tiny bottles? Why on Earth do I have to pour shampoo from one bottle into another like I’m “marrying” ketchups back at that horrible restaurant I worked in during college?
All important questions.
As an intrepid reporter, I wanted to find the answers, so I went to the only place I thought could give them to me: Bed Bath & Beyond. OK, so maybe Bed Bath & Beyond couldn’t tell me if there was a vast conspiracy involving the TSA, our deficit with the Chinese, and makers of fine shampoos, but the retailer has just made it easier for travelers to meet TSA regulations. In a stroke of marketing genius, they’re offering a package that contains 15 bottles of assorted shapes (all meeting the 3 oz. requirement) for your shampoo, conditioner, hairspray, gel, perfume, etc. The package even comes in a handy 1 qt. zip-top bag, which also meets the TSA’s requirements.
But that’s not all. One of the managers at my local Bed Bath & Beyond was kind enough to show me an entire section of products that the store has recently labeled as ‘approved for travel.’ And that’s not some sort of metaphorical label, you’ll see an ‘approved for travel’ sign right there on the bin. They have most everything you would ever need for travel purposes right there in the tiny little containers. Many of the products are available for $.99 to $5.00. Hmmm, maybe somebody is in cahoots with the TSA, after all. Were the sellers of fragrant conditioners and lime green trashcans in on all of this? I had to dig deeper.
Unfortunately, I left BBB knowing little more about the reasons behind rule 3-1-1 than when I walked in. But I did get some travel bottles and a lovely throw pillow for the couch. Luckily, those young upstarts over at the New York Times were working on the story, as well, and Joe Sharkey wrote a great article that points out that the rule isn’t as arbitrary as we all might think:
“Tests showed that a container of a certain size is needed for an effective explosion. Separate three-ounce containers limited in number to what will fit inside a single one-quart bag do not have ‘enough critical diameter’ to blow up an aircraft…”
OK. So the science is there to back the rule up, and the stores are there to make it easy for us to meet the regulations. Maybe we can all stop complaining about it now. Or at least let the conspiracy theories go.